DPP Submission

This is a request and petition to discontinue the false Warwick matter for the following reasons:

It is confirmed by the 2 people at the property:
• Miss W reached out to them the night before requesting to visit with them proven by midnight call and early morning facebook messages requesting this.
• It was Miss W’s own request to bring Miss A as proven by text messages.
• Miss A then stated to shortly after arriving on the premise of learning to play music for the band that she “Doesn’t like to use condoms because she likes the feeling of cum inside her.” She then stated to just David at a time after Miss A had gone inside and Kittie had excused herself provocatively reoeat d the same statement to him while holding eye contact and smiling at him.
• Miss A then compounded the comment by later stating while dirt ng on him: “I want your dick in me.”. He never engaged in either activity suggested to or requested of him.
• Being public figures, on prior legal advise by representatives, after her showing this interest, they responded responsibly with a printed laminated affirmative consent form to certify an outward discussion about consent.
• They assert Miss As response to this was clear, bright, lucid and she outwardly communicated the word yes to the form and later confirms this as her answer to police and under oath.
• Miss A downed her first drink and when both David and her were politely offered another Miss A, a seasoned drinker, 6 foot tall with her own favourite regulars, who was drinking JD and wine with her mother the previous night, she admitted this under oath, she stated outwardly that she would like her next drink to be without ice or soft drink mixer because she prefers to ‘Drink it straight”.
• Miss W was able to and showed no interest in the form, as an open discussion to ascertain the person’s response to it to understand their interest was the precise purpose of the form which demonstrates clarity and free will since one said no and nothing happened and the other said yes.
• Miss A then learned a song for the band, engaged in light foreplay to act on the communication of consent then left on foot at Miss W’s request. Miss A complained I don’t wanna leave, but Miss W insisted.
• There is some considerable history of vendetta from local police to the accused, a total of 9 previous empty charges brought and withdrawn or dismissed at court for no evidence including: wilful damage, assault, theft, extortion, drug possession and more.
• The vendetta has become so mindless that this might be the first time in Queensland that a written consent form has been outwardly agreed to, that fact asserted under oath and yet police still desperately stitch together a rape case.

000 call:
• Miss W instructed that Miss A walk 10 minutes away from the property and other houses into the bush, she has stranded them after being refused a free lift by yellow cabs. After berating Miss A for her behaviour at the property as they walk together, Miss W pulls out her own phone, dials 000 and hands it to Miss A to do the talking. This is admitted under oath.
• Miss A opens the call by asking “Can you send a police car or something to where I am now?”
• She is then immediately heard being badgered by Miss W and is heard responding with frustration towards he exclaiming “Stop, Miss W, Stop!”. Miss W is doing something to her she is not comfortable with.
• Miss A answers yes to the question of if her drink was spiked, but this was proven false by her upright demeanour and a forensic test of the drinks.
• Miss A claims she was touched all of a sudden which is later debunked by the admission to police then under oath that she had outwardly said yes to a printed laminated consent form. She avoided mentioning this to 000.
• The purpose was to sound distressed enough to garner a lift with police.
• Miss W takes over the phone once alarm is raised to ask if the ride will be taking them to ipswich and shows frustration when told they will be taken to the hospital first just to make sure Miss A is telling the truth. Miss W whines “well where would that be?”
• Miss A then takes over the phones and states “ I can’t I just can’t do this, “ meaning I can’t do this to them the fake report to get a lift. But it’s already too late, the ambulance is on its way.

93A statement made to police:
Upon deeper and repeated questioning by officers once they got to the hospital Miss A recalls in detail the hair colour clothing and writing on the printed laminated consent form and confirms she understood it was an open communication about sexual permission.
• Miss A confirms to the investigating officer now she is no longer stranded in a park that she outwardly said yes to the printed laminated consent form, but police decide charge them both with rape anyway. The long shot stupefication charge was only invented after the drink spiking was a non starter.
• Miss then goes on to make an absurd claim that she was drinking because she had no phone credit and no contact with anyone, a lie because she was clearly there with her friend, who had a working phone then later admits she had a working phone herself the whole time as she was on facebook talking to people, was alert the whole time but different to her friend who just wanted to get transport miss A never contacted anyone to come pick her up for any reason even though she is seen on her phone on cctv. She had contact with the world but made no effort to leave.
• She then lied to the officer by staring that she was provided and made to smoke cigarettes, a lie because she later reveals she was not made to do this, they were her cigarettes, she brought them, rolled them and smoked them herself, even rolled them for other people.
• She makes a range of false allegations that are contested but most notably, she claims to the officer in a formal statement that she “never participated in the kissing at any point” but is seen on cctv around 3 hour’s into visiting the property, the king up to and initiating a kiss with the person she said to 000 she never gave any form of consent to. She then brought this false statement in under her oath in court.

• However the most shocking and outstanding fact that proves police made the non consent charge maliciously is that both police and ambulance, just 10 minutes after exiting the property, knowing her age, without any parental consultation, police and medical staff professionally assessed that Miss A in fact did have the capacity to consent and was asked by police if she would consent to an invasive medical exam to confirm she was telling the truth. A Canadian court has found that a higher degree of lucidity is required for consent to a medical procedure than to engage in intimacy.
• After police and medical authorities both agree she has the capacity to consent soon after exiting the property, Her next move was outstanding, she consented to the exam, then promptly dove on a direct request to ensure they were both getting a lift home out of all of this, when it was not certain if she would be obtaining a lift, she subsequently declined any physical exam and has never engaged in one.
• Police and medical staff failed to complete any blood, urine or breath tests.
• To try to save herself, Miss W’s most notably comment to police, which she then later brought in under her oath, was that it was Miss A’s phone that was used to make the 000 call when it was her own. She did this to shift the blame onto Miss A for the same reason that she made her do the talking to 000. She knew what she was doing was wrong and the other 3 were pawns in her game.
• Only a few months later, Miss A is named on a meme by her new best friend who knows her character showing 2 old ladies searching around a street corner with the caption: “Me and my bestie after 50 years still looking for dick.” Actual rape victims would not have that view, find that funny or allow it to be left up.

Miss A testimony under oath at preliminary hearing:
• Over 2 years later Miss A was finally on the stand at a preliminary hearing to question her about her story. She claimed everything she said to police was the truth, which means she was drinking because she had no phone credit, unless she was lying under oath.
• Even though the 93A was recorded and sworn in as true, Miss A claims she never told police that she said yes to the form. She later admits that she did. She willingly lied under oath about not consenting and has no credibility.
• She later fabricated a story which she invented when talking to police that now she only consented so nothing bad would happen, even though nothing bad happened to the friend who did not consent, she also says she consented willingly just because she liked them and us also seen willingly engaging in kissing. It’s just more lies and more blame to not get into trouble for the hoax call to get a lift.
• Even though she was overage she then goes on to repeat a provocative false rhetoric that she was a child or infant at the time when in fact she is 6 feet tall and previously fought and won the right to be legally recognised as an adult by a Queensland court. She can sign a lease, buy a house, sign a legal will and bring a court action in her own name. Police probably weren’t aware of this when they coached her to use a disgusting and wilfully inflammatory false claim of pedophilia to pervert the court process and engineer false perceptions and prejudice the case.
• She admits she drinks a lot, has a regular favourite alcoholic drink, was drinking casually of her own free will and admits she was alert and freely consenting all throughout the whole night, while under oath. There is zero physical evidence to the contrary of that and the only physical evidence we have is of the girl feely consenting. She is in fact the one initiating.

Miss W testimony under oath at preliminary hearing:
• Miss W clearly criticised Miss A’s behavior in facebook messages to her friend James stating that she was disgusted at her behaviour and was considering ending the friendship because of it. Not what you say if your friend is in a car accident or some other tragedy. She was dehumanising her to prepare for using her to get transport.
• Miss W makes the false claim under oath that, even though moments before and after she is see walking briskly past the camera that conveniently she was so unconscious she could not move and yet later she admits that Miss A was conscious the whole time do that was a lie on a material question of the case, under oath.
• Miss W is then asked point blank if she decided to make the call, pulled out her phone, dialled 000 and handed it to Miss A to do the talking. The court was silent for 16 seconds while everyone waited for her answer. She finally responded meekly, I, I can’t remember. The real answer is yes she did that and did not want to get into trouble for misusing and emergency service.
• The most outstanding perjury, one she frankly should go to prison for was one that directly attacked at the fabric of the court system and a very bold attempt to mislead the court on a material question of the case to obtain a false conviction for life imprisonment on two innocent people was where she was asked ‘and you did not assist her in walking in any way as you left?’ she responded: No. Oh yes I did sorry. How did you do that? She then, to prove she is not just mistaken about this material fact goes on to describe that Miss A was so incapacitated that she needed to have her arm Around Miss W’s neck as they left the property just to be able to walk, however, Miss A is seen on cctv at this time, walking right by her on her own 2 feet, carrying her own bag walking completely separately as Miss W is in fact ignoring her texting on her phone making everyone stand and wait for her for over 30 seconds.

The 2 defendants are clearly victims of a misuse of an emergency service offence for the fact that the call only came after many hours of the 2 girls remaining at the property, many hours after the initial intimate interactions, only after one stranded the other far away from the property in bushland, after attempting but failing to have someone drink drive instead of calling police, asking the defendant to pay for a cab instead of calling police, asking the cab company itself to give her a free lift instead of calling police, planning to book the cab for herself and do a runner at the other end instead of calling police and only then as a last resort made the call when she could get the friend to do the dirty work.
Miss W dialled the call to police then she got in on the emergency call halfway through and made sure the lift was going where she wanted it to. This is why there are so many absurdities, contradictions and lies in their subsequent story. These facts are now apparent to thousands of qlders and it’s horrifying that police are still dragging it all through the courts thinking that nobody is noticing. They are. Real rape victims, journalists, many lawyers and barristers.
There is government verification that she had the capacity to consent. That’s government verification that she is overage, mature independent and legally recognised as an adult at the time. The case disintegrating admissions, made on their own would have already made the matter unable to even be committed to trial and all the other claims are firmly debunked on even light perusal of the evidence that already defeats each bizarre claim made to get a free lift. We ask you to drop the false case. They’re sick of it.

These people are sick of going to court ‘just in case’ because an officer brought another false charge full of proof there is no basis for it and this ashamedly boasts Queensland’s first rape charge where a girl has already admitted she said yes to a printed laminated consent form and the only witness already boldly lied against the cctv to mislead the court. It is reckless to then put this before a jury who has already been tampered with by false media and the very rare occurrence of police attending the homes of witnesses to warn them not to defend the people they have falsely charged.

1000s of people now know these facts as a result of media spitefully using the charge to publish defamatory articles with the false claims carried into the police report along with a petition to stop the false case by the defendants in response to this harassment and corruption. You can’t blame them since this is clearly mischief on behalf of the 2 girls, made into yet another major false flag event against these people. The ‘see if we can get away with life imprisonment on a false complaint’ play game needs to stop.

The petitioners include ACTUAL rape victims who are angry about the pursuit the fca false case that gas no merit for political reasons when their own real complaint was dismissed by police because there was ‘not enough evidence’.
Ana – 24 – “It’s pretty clear the lies that have been told & it’s ridiculous how far this has gone & the trouble the girls have caused. Leave it for the real cases. Grow up & fess up.”
Seline – 21 – “Because false accusations have clearly been seen.”
Sam – 31 – “Because it’s false.”
Mckenna – 17 – “It’s obvious the girls are clearly lying.”
Sally – 27 – “Evidence proving that she wasn’t’
Lisa – 25 – “Because insufficient evidence/evidence not matching up to support the claims and keep changing story.”
Sheri – 44 – “Complainants lied.”
Chloe – 28 – “The girl lied under oath and there is clear evidence of that.”
Sasha – 26 – “There is evidence and proof of the girl falsifying evidence and in many cases downright lying, changing testimony and appearing to manipulate the situation for her for own personal benefit.”
Rosie – 19 – “Evidence provided that she is lying.”
Ben – 39 – “‘Victims’ clearly lying.”
Kathrin – 34 – “Because I know that they are lying and they shouldn’t proceed with a false case.”
Jessica – 25 – “There is clearly proof the accusations are false.”
Daniel – 25 – “Unfair case and conditions.”
Mel – 29 – “It is defamation and injust.”