In their July 2015 article Channel 9 refers to David’s personality as a completely calculating forethinking planning criminal and yet at the same time also completely out of control of his own actions and thoughts and the Sydney court decreed that they had therefore told the truth, even though what they said is not logically possible.
It’s like saying it’s true that he was standing on the ground and not standing on the ground or that the standard issue coin landed flat and it showed heads and tails at the same time.
Logically, at least one must be a lie, if not both.
Google what ‘mutually exclusive’ means for more info.
This is the problem when you go on a relentless smear campaign, they end up saying other things that defeat and logically disprove the previous lies they told. As long as you can get a ‘court’ to agree with you I guess..
Liars exposed.
9/MSN/Fairfax introduces force and harshness where there was none. A girl acts consensually and they say she was drugged or saying a girl was cajoled into drinking when she provided her alcohol discount card to buy the alcohol at a lower price and suggested all other girls should drink when hanging out with the band on an audio recording or when a musician is looking forward to playing a concert because of a lifelong love of playing music and saying he has no intention of putting on or playing at the event to stop ticket sales.
It’s one thing to just say it as words and images in the media to bring hateful posts and messages to take their customers and support people away, it’s yet another to make the lie out to police to rain terror on the person and take away their liberties. If you’re against this being done to people, like this page and stay updated to find out who you should avoid so you can lessen the risk of coming into contact with someone who does this, like 9, Shayla, India and others. These people will do it to you if you’re not careful.
9/MSN/Fairfax introduces force and harshness where there was none. A girl acts consensually and they say she was drugged or saying a girl was cajoled into drinking when she provided her alcohol discount card to buy the alcohol at a lower price and suggested all other girls should drink when hanging out with the band on an audio recording or when a musician is looking forward to playing a concert because of a lifelong love of playing music and saying he has no intention of putting on or playing at the event to stop ticket sales.
It’s one thing to just say it as words and images in the media to bring hateful posts and messages to take their customers and support people away, it’s yet another to make the lie out to police to rain terror on the person and take away their liberties. If you’re against this being done to people, like this page and stay updated to find out who you should avoid so you can lessen the risk of coming into contact with someone who does this, like 9, Shayla, India and others. These people will do it to you if you’re not careful.
You think you’ve got problems with dv.. Imagine if your ex had 30 faces, he rang up every time you got a new job and got you fired, took you to court and paid the judge to take your inheritance away from you, lied to all your family about you and they believed him,, paid people to message all your friends on facebook, got you kicked out of your place and now you can’t rent anywhere and followed you to another country to stop their government from helping you, that’s channel 9.
It’s corporate domestic violence.
Understand the format of the end of liars:
On this date this person said this, but this piece of evidence contradicts what they said so they knew they were lying when they said it and the reason why they lied on tv was this and the damage they wanted to do was this.
Example: Suddenly and only after seeing the first fake article by Channel 9 halfway through the trip, Shayla Chandler started saying she didn’t know it was now only 3 of us going away together, as if to say she was tricked and deceived into only the 3 of us going – but this is a lie because text messages between David and her the previous day show she knew she was lying about that when she said it in the paper and on tv and wanted to go anyway even just as the 3 of them and the damage her lie did was make people in Australia, United States and Europe think she was tricked into going on her own to act like a victim when she wasn’t. This lie is designed to bring undeserved hatred on her target, David Otto, when he actually went to the extra trouble of being honest with her and give her an out before they left, which she didn’t want to take because the 3 of them had been out socially before.
So you register what the lie was and by whom then recognise the evidence that disproves it. Become aware that you’ve been lied to about David Otto in the media and that it’s probably one of the worst sabotage/coverups by media in entertainment history. Then the real hatred arises towards the girl who lied to you about him for tricking you into having undeserved sympathy for and giving undeserved pity to her.
Now you’re wiser for having used this resource.
